-2.5
Impact

Apple Says Jobs Knew of Options

Flag As Inappropriateunsafeatanyspeed unsafeatanyspeed about 1 year ago about Apple

From the New York Times:

SAN FRANCISCO, Oct. 4 — Apple Computer said on Wednesday that an internal review had found that Steven P. Jobs, the chief executive, knew that the company was backdating some stock options granted to employees to inflate their value.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/05/tec…

10 people found this important

  • unsafeatanyspeed
  • skyking
  • ryan
  • Krazy
  • jarkko
  • Marshall_Banana
  • wiseman666
  • pilotgirl
  • glennzinho
  • Eldarie

Not important? Don't rate! Why? Your Impact Rating

Log In To Submit Your Rating

Comments

skyking

another Enron brewing???

skyking about 1 year ago

Fix it Jobs or get more bad PR & see Iphones fail BIG time. FYI. Unwise leadership. Dumb. Impacts employees.

Flag As Inappropriate
jarkko
Verified representative for dotherightthing.com

Where's the negative?

jarkko about 1 year ago

You might want to read the whole story before jumping on the bashing bandwagon. There’s actually nothing really new in it.

Apple revealed in June that it had discovered irregularities related to stock options awarded between 1997 and 2001.

So, this all happened 6 to 10 years ago. It’s not about their current practices. Isn’t it a good rather than a bad thing they’re inspecting (of their own initiative) and correcting the thing?

The company said Mr. Jobs did not knowingly receive any backdated options and had not benefited from the practice, and that he did not understand its accounting implications.

So while Jobs might have known about what was happening, there is no evidence he knew it was illegal. As a matter of fact,

Mr. Wolf said it was within reason that Mr. Jobs would not have paid attention to the backdating, particularly given that it was common and legal. “I don’t think he’d know an asset from a liability,” Mr. Wolf said of Mr. Jobs. “That’s not his game.”

So not only is the whole title of the article questionable, the whole act that happened was legal before the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Moreover, all the people that were part of the issue, have left (read: kicked out from) Apple since then. So I would actually take this as a positive sign about that Apple is carrying its responsibilities.

Flag As Inappropriate
dsk

dsk about 1 year ago

I’d have to agree with Jarkko here. There is a significant amount of confusion around the rules. Here’s some info:

http://news.com.com/FAQ+Behind+the+st…

Flag As Inappropriate

Log In To Add A Comment

Other recent stories about Apple

Apple Announces new effort to go green in response to Greenpeace campaign
Greenpeace just won a Webby for their A Greener Apple website. http://news.com.com/2300-1026_3-61809… [read more]
Greenpeace ranks Apple most toxic
In its “Green Electronics Guide”, Greenpeace ranked Apple the worst out of 14 electronics manufacturers (for the second time in a row) in its toxic chemical producing index. [read more]
iPod Produced in Conditions that Violate Apple's Code of Conduct
Apple has a Code of Conduct for their suppliers. The iPod is produced in China by a company that was violating their Code of Conduct. [read more]
Apple and EMI offer DRM-less songs and videos on iTunes Store
Apple and EMI will offer music tracks and videos without Digital Rights Management on the iTunes Store beginning in May 2007. [read more]

Read all stories about Apple