-2.3
Impact

Yahoo Using Dirty Tactics to Switch Google & Firefox Users?

Flag As Inappropriatesigriffin sigriffin over 5 years ago about Yahoo

Andy Beal warns people about Yahoo!’s attempt to take over their desktops:

“…a recent upgrade to Yahoo Messenger includes an innocuous ‘auto-update’ option. When the user gives Yahoo permission to ‘update’ – what they think is just Yahoo Messenger – the updater… then proceeds to hijack many browser preferences – including search engine settings.”

Firstly, the updater associates all web links with Internet Explorer instead of your default browser (very annoying for Firefox / Opera users!). Secondly, it pops up an ambiguous error message telling you that your search settings have been changed and that you can either “fix” them or “allow change”. Thinking that they’re about to lose their browser defaults, most people will click “fix settings”. Upon doing so however, they’ll find that their default homepage has been switched to Yahoo! And for its final trick, the updater switches IE’s default search engine to Yahoo! without your permission. Nice work :-(

When Andy complained about this to Yahoo!, the response he received (from Yahoo! spokesperson Terrell Karlsten) said “This is an industry-wide practice.” Great stuff. So if everyone else is doing it, that makes it OK does it? What would his Mum say? “If everyone else jumped off a cliff, would Yahoo!?”

(see also: Etre)

250 people found this important

  • sigriffin
  • jarkko
  • soccerTOOLsu
  • Loren
  • ryan
  • rhjr
  • beng
  • steve91
  • mikaln317
  • daniel
  • emchilds
  • kelly
  • bostonvaulter
  • shannon
  • lilmeowmeow
  • mikkel
  • wilby34
  • mfpb4000
  • Robert
  • panoptican
  • felipevaz
  • precid
  • mushumax
  • aBitGone
  • migraineboy
  • oyvind
  • sveskemus
  • olrs
  • Nils
  • nasdaquiri
  • RPaulH
  • colin
  • Niloofar
  • Jolee
  • bmoseley07
  • Chealion
  • bowenmark
  • shawny
  • jackzheng
  • sv
  • techcrunch
  • xavierlouveau
  • hauntedtapedeck
  • headlessness
  • PurpleCow
  • mitu
  • yoda
  • dkamm
  • billpapa
  • Gus3284
  • geek27
  • tuckerlee
  • lyndon
  • riviera
  • adverteasement
  • chitalian
  • Andrew
  • BloatedBunny
  • GradyTripp
  • bdielman
  • ilkeryoldas
  • scrambledheads
  • monoid
  • david28078
  • DieBuche
  • webg
  • binsch
  • sona
  • doconnor
  • richard
  • mitnosam
  • johnnysoko
  • malekshda3wa
  • llnull
  • raprat0
  • tasovi
  • thierry
  • rowlando
  • qwerty73
  • tparlin
  • AdamJacobMuller
  • wadexyz
  • prowsej
  • philipkd
  • eestes1
  • bsaitz
  • vscarpenter
  • avocade
  • Gabriel
  • Krazy
  • sumo27
  • petitpiet
  • ilves
  • keithzhl
  • wkinney
  • yingqi
  • lookitsbeige
  • gopher
  • rajesh
  • ngandriau
  • fh11375
  • dmaw
  • webonics
  • psheehan
  • toaddodger
  • michaelbenson
  • Heartofgold
  • mojen
  • Michaelblake
  • tommyswf
  • significance
  • sicc
  • chickentonight
  • Jebrooks
  • spectre240sx
  • ashleycharee
  • Robse
  • thefunnyman
  • rolandog
  • bitcloud
  • klayborg
  • raffo
  • Omnituinen
  • p11b
  • kidnapyourmate
  • Kavok
  • nocturn
  • Lucanos
  • piglith
  • komodododo
  • MattHarwood
  • siu02db
  • Partyworm
  • Reines
  • RedeyeAP
  • hdar
  • Devin
  • m00dc0ntr0l
  • prodaea
  • cesarhcjr
  • dansage
  • escriba
  • erikwas
  • iamthepinkylifter
  • glauser
  • evaunit
  • sleeknbasic
  • edgesmash
  • datarock
  • jolietjake
  • Veinor
  • alland
  • strandist
  • punzak
  • indianaugust
  • ham666bone
  • miko023
  • viriiman
  • theckhd
  • wasylm
  • bubbalitz
  • softmax
  • sarroid04
  • forexproject
  • curtis1984
  • grelf
  • Meltdown721
  • Rudes
  • VegasRex
  • tommyk
  • Bearymore
  • odiyya
  • roothorick
  • jaysonwhelpley
  • cigarettevoodoo
  • Beerden
  • Mercion
  • silvertoes
  • Josh
  • boboroshi
  • serhio
  • belmonster
  • ClobberHead
  • mojokelt
  • Math
  • Dysalot
  • kens8
  • CaveatKenny
  • Theo
  • greymaxcat
  • undergroundman
  • osipov
  • Isht
  • DeleteMe
  • Marshall_Banana
  • justelite
  • plus-media
  • ltgeo
  • kell_pt
  • KaneElson
  • vineetb
  • rjmatm
  • RobertDuncan
  • twitmer
  • tdkpetrus
  • skyiscool
  • needium
  • JCSaint
  • bored911
  • Katee
  • Mysk
  • ngardam
  • cham0169
  • jefffm
  • Czernobog
  • pr0teus
  • mercury76
  • minidore
  • jerrett
  • jO3Design
  • peterpixel
  • hectica
  • Hoobahopp
  • mgirando
  • DragonFly
  • Michael
  • kanotoa
  • johngalt2099
  • sparklygirl
  • Marshall
  • IronZerg
  • LucaMasters
  • VTSara
  • huangcjz
  • sdemessieres
  • Keiji
  • StevenChen
  • abhiz
  • elixai
  • sunisa93
  • reichmannj
  • norz
  • seosmarty
  • fjord6er
  • rod
  • Shadowspawn
  • smp
  • hbarnick
  • maryif
  • jhaugan

Not important? Don't rate! Why? Your Impact Rating

Log In To Submit Your Rating

Comments

ryan
Flag As Inappropriate

Industry practice huh? Does gtalk do any of the above-mentioned settings invasions?

ryan over 5 years ago

soccerTOOLsu
Flag As Inappropriate

Industry-wide practice VS Industry-leading practice

This may be part of the reason, YHOO is only $30 and GOOG is $500. Go figure.

soccerTOOLsu over 5 years ago

Loren
Flag As Inappropriate

Hopefully Google takes the high road here and doesn’t respond in kind.

Loren over 5 years ago

kelly
Flag As Inappropriate

I don’t think Google will ever do this. If only because it promises “Not to be evil.” This kinda seems slightly evil to me.

kelly over 5 years ago

Robert
Flag As Inappropriate

No, not like a ghost – but “boo” as in “bad move Yahoo”. I hate tactics that try to switch my defaults. Mess with my search engine of choice, and you’re rm’d from my system.

Robert over 5 years ago

aBitGone
Flag As Inappropriate

Dreadful practices – and as for it being standard practice in the industry? If you count the ‘badware’ pushers as industry, then yes – it is. Even Microsoft tells you clearly what each option is going to do.

aBitGone over 5 years ago

RPaulH
Flag As Inappropriate

i agree with all the comments here—customer trust needs to be valued, not stomped on.

anyway, i would like to point out that per-share price does not matter – total market value that multiplies it by number of shares does.

yahoo is worth $38 billion ($28/share) google is worth $150 billion ($495/share) berkshire hathaway is worth $165 billion ($106,700 /share)

share price is only psychological and relates to behavioral economics. share splits yield a 5% rise, for no fundamental reason than perceived “affordability”

thank you class – finance 101 is done for today.

RPaulH over 5 years ago

geek27
Flag As Inappropriate

yet another reason to stay with google

geek27 over 5 years ago

adverteasement
Flag As Inappropriate

As long as white collars try and run the Internet, we will never really see its potential. Hijacking is just bad, and sad.

Related Image

Related Image

adverteasement over 5 years ago

Niloofar
Flag As Inappropriate

Dirty Trick!

Niloofar over 5 years ago

ilkeryoldas
Flag As Inappropriate

Why do they bring down people’s trust like that..

ilkeryoldas over 5 years ago

MigsDavis
Flag As Inappropriate

about google… refer to one of my favorite bloggers… Danah Boyd’s article a practice broken

But anyway, a confusing process, seemingly deceptive in intent, is a sign of desperation or possibly malice- simply bad customer service. Company’s with bad customer service don’t usually do to well… I think?

MigsDavis over 5 years ago

david28078
Flag As Inappropriate

Yahoo! seem to be getting naughtier

Related Image

Related Image

david28078 over 5 years ago

richard
Flag As Inappropriate

I hated this when I did my Yahoo Messenger update, and removed all those junks immediately. It is disappointing to see Yahoo doing this. I thought “only” Microsoft does that.

richard over 5 years ago

llnull
Flag As Inappropriate

流氓行为

llnull over 5 years ago

gopher
Flag As Inappropriate

I do agree that this is a nasty way to fool the novice user and hijack his browser settings but then again, I also know that IE has been doing this for ages !

gopher over 5 years ago

rexebin
Flag As Inappropriate

that is stupid and smart. The stupid thing is that some people hate behavior like that. the smart thing is some people do not mind, especially people who use computer as a tool, they do not really understand what yahoo’ve done, they just simply accepted everything that is not a virus.

rexebin over 5 years ago

Michaelblake
Flag As Inappropriate

This is one of the many things that really get me angry while on the internet. Companies using behavior like that is 100% inappropriate, especially a company like Yahoo, a company who many see as a “good” company. I didn’t know about this until I read this here. This is a reason I don’t use IE anymore as well!

Michaelblake over 5 years ago

dansage
Flag As Inappropriate

This just goes to show the difference in corporate culture at places like Yahoo vs. Google. We’ve all felt it for a very long time and maybe just not been able to pinpoint what doesn’t feel right about certain companies. It’s their entire culture which comes out to show itself in actions like this.

dansage over 5 years ago

sleeknbasic
Flag As Inappropriate

This happened to me. I could NOT get rid of the Yahoo redirection. I used Hijackthis, malware, spyware programs, to no avail. I had to uninstall Internet Explorer 7.0, re-install 6.0 and NO, I don’t have YAHOO MESSENGER – I switched it all to Trillian. I suggest you check this out, http://www.trillian.cc/. And the best thing, you can use it with Tor and other http overides.

sleeknbasic over 5 years ago

belmonster
Flag As Inappropriate

It really chaps my hide when ANY software package sets preferences to what they think they should be. (Are you listening, Microsoft?)

belmonster over 5 years ago

Theo
Flag As Inappropriate

And they are supposedly trying to endear themselves to more people! Nice way of going about it.

Theo over 5 years ago

DragonFly
Flag As Inappropriate

”..the updater associates all web links with Internet Explorer”

That’s reason enough to avoid Yahoo Messenger for me!

DragonFly over 5 years ago

Marshall
Flag As Inappropriate

Its obvious Yahoo has been losing big chunks of market share (revenue) to Google. But, trying to win it back at the expense of their customers is flat out wrong. This strategy is simply about generating short term advertising revenue, but alienating your customer base in the process makes no sense! Ahem, is it really that hard to do the right thing?

Marshall over 5 years ago

Post a Comment

You can use textile formatting to spice up your comment.
Optional

Other recent stories about Yahoo

Anti-censorship policy and human rights related proposals rejected by stockholders
Two proposals asking the board to adopt an anti-censorship policy and to pay more attention to human rights in markets where it is active (specifically China) have been rejected by stockholders. [read more]
Flickr going the censorship way
Recently Rebekka Guðleifsdóttira got ripped off from the gallery (Only Dreemin) she was using to sell her artwork. [read more]
Del.icio.us a great Yahoo Service
Yahoo offers a bookmarking service called ‘Delicious’ or del.icio.us where I can save and share bookmarks with other people who have the same interest. One of these bookmarks is this site of course as well as other green responsible sites and companies. A great way to share interests with other same minded people. [read more]
Yahoo! Pushes Green Living
Yahoo is becoming earth-friendly by announcing the launch of “Yahoo! Green” and “Be a better planet” initiatives. [read more]
Yahoo commits to carbon neutrality this year
Yahoo just recently announced at an all-hands meeting that the company will be going carbon neutral this year. They have estimated that “Yahoo! going carbon neutral is equivalent to shutting off the electricity in all San Francisco homes for a month. Or, pulling nearly 25,000 cars off the road for a year.” [read more]

Read all stories about Yahoo

Change business

+ Post your idea!

(please Sign up or Log in first)

Follow The Action

Stats and Impact

  • 2650 active people
  • 605 active companies
  • 108 ideas
  • 1 considered ideas
  • 2 launched ideas!